System and Organization Controls 2 (SOC 2) Type 2 compliance is like acing the final exam and earning a 4.0 grade in information security for organizations that handle customer information. SOC 2 is an attestation report developed by the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) that demonstrates companies meet high standards for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy, collectively referred to as the Trust Service Criteria (TSC). SOC 2 Type 2 reports offer a detailed evaluation of an organization’s internal controls over a period, typically six months to a year, making it particularly important for cloud computing providers and data centers. This attestation signals to clients that the company is serious about protecting sensitive data from unauthorized access and breaches and provides assurance the appropriate controls are in place.
Getting SOC 2 Type 2 certified is no small feat. The audit process involves a thorough evaluation by independent auditors who scrutinize the effectiveness of an organization’s controls, particularly around security frameworks like ISO 27001 and HIPAA. The Type 2 audit is an in-depth look at how well the company’s controls operate over time, aligning with key TSC (Trust Service Criteria) that provides assurance the company’s control environment is robust and sustainable.
Achieving this attestation builds trust with clients and stakeholders and gives companies a competitive edge in industries where information security and data protection are paramount. With SOC 2 Type 2 compliance, businesses can confidently assure their customers that their data is protected, paving the way for long-term relationships.
In this article, we’ll explore the key differences between SOC 2 Type 1 and Type 2, identify who needs this attestation, break down its essential components, and discuss the costs involved. Let’s dive in and uncover what makes SOC 2 Type 2 a crucial milestone for data security in the modern age of cloud computing.
What is SOC 2?
SOC 2 (Service Organization Control 2) is an attestation report that shows your company is serious about safeguarding customer data. Think of it as a detailed report card for how well your internal systems and processes protect sensitive information. Developed by the AICPA (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), SOC 2 focuses on five core areas: Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy—commonly called the Trust Services Criteria (TSC).
SOC 2 compliance is essential for any business handling customer data, especially those in cloud computing. Whether you’re a SaaS provider, in finance, or managing a data center, SOC 2 compliance shows clients, prospective customers, and other external stakeholders that your organization has the right controls to protect their information.
Why SOC 2 Matters
A SOC 2 report acts as an independent opinion from an auditor, assessing whether your internal security controls are designed effectively and, in the case of a SOC 2 Type 2 audit, whether they function well over time. This is not a one-time attestation but a continuous evaluation of your systems over a period of 6 to 12 months. A SOC report is a powerful tool to build trust, especially for clients concerned about PCI DSS compliance or organizations following ISO 27001 standards.
Imagine you’re evaluating a new cloud service provider. A company with a SOC 2 attestation isn’t just telling you that it protects data—it has assurance from an independent SOC audit that it will back up and that it will do well over time. This kind of transparency can set a business apart from competitors.
SOC 2 Report: A Valuable Asset
After completing a Type 2 audit, a company receives a detailed SOC report, which includes an opinion of how well its internal controls are designed and how effectively they operate over time. An “unqualified” opinion means the auditor firm has no reservations about the internal controls that are in place. A “qualified” report tells external stakeholders that there may be gaps in the company’s internal controls and this potential risk to the data they transmit, process, or store. Earning an unqualified report demonstrates that your systems aren’t just adequate but are actively protecting customer data day in and day out. It’s a great way to foster trust and communicate your commitment to information security.
Types of SOC 2 Reports
Regarding SOC 2 compliance, there are two primary types of reports: Type 1 and Type 2. Both evaluate an organization’s security controls, but they do so in different ways.
SOC 2 Type 1: The Snapshot
Think of SOC 2 Type 1 as a quick snapshot that shows whether your security controls are properly designed at a specific point in time. It’s a relatively fast process, often completed within weeks, and it attests that the right controls are in place. However, it doesn’t show how well those controls function over time, making it a good starting point but limited in terms of long-term assurance. It’s especially useful if you need to show clients that you have security measures in place quickly. This will usually be your first milestone to SOC 2 compliance.
SOC 2 Type 2: The Long-Term Test
SOC 2 Type 2, on the other hand, evaluates the control environment over an extended period—typically 6 to 12 months—assessing whether your security controls are operating effectively throughout that time. This type of audit process is much more rigorous, as it involves an in-depth look into various areas, including your company’s access controls, policies, and operational effectiveness. A readiness assessment can help prepare your organization for this audit by identifying potential gaps before the formal process begins.
Why Type 2 Carries More Weight
For a client looking at security, SOC 2 Type 1 says, “Yes, this company has controls in place,” but SOC 2 Type 2 says, “Not only do they have these controls, but they also work consistently over time.” It’s a deeper level of trust and is often preferred in highly regulated industries. Larger enterprises often require Type 2 because it provides more robust assurance of ongoing security practices. If you are processing data for one of these companies, they will be relying on these controls for their own compliance and data governance, which is why trust is so crucial.
SOC 2 and SOC 3
Because SOC 2 reports are so detailed, they are often private and considered proprietary information to the organization. A SOC 3 report is designed to be a more general summary for public consumption. It’s a useful tool for marketing and reassuring clients without revealing too much about your internal systems.
The Competitive Edge
In today’s world, where data breaches make headlines, SOC 2 compliance sends a strong message: “We take security seriously.” This builds trust with existing clients and helps attract new business as more companies demand their vendors meet high-security standards. SOC 2 compliance can also open doors to new business opportunities, as many clients won’t or cannot even consider working with non-compliant vendors.
By gaining trust with external stakeholders, SOC 2 compliance can give your company a significant competitive edge. In industries like tech, finance, and healthcare, it’s more than a nice-to-have—it’s often a necessity. Whether your company is pursuing PCI DSS compliance, aligning with ISO 27001, or looking for a foothold in competitive markets, achieving SOC 2 attestation shows that your organization values risk management and security.
In short, SOC 2 compliance isn’t just a checkbox activity; it’s a valuable investment in your company’s long-term security, reputation, and success.
Who Needs to Be SOC 2 Type 2 Compliant?
If your company stores, processes, or transmits customer data, especially if you operate in sectors like SaaS, cloud services, or as a third-party vendor, SOC 2 Type 2 compliance is crucial. It’s not just about having security controls—it’s about demonstrating those controls work continuously over time. For your clients, this translates into peace of mind, that their sensitive data is safe from breaches. For your business, it provides a competitive edge and helps build long-term trust.
SOC 2 Audit Process
Achieving SOC 2 compliance involves a detailed audit process where independent auditors assess your internal controls, focusing on areas like access controls and security policies. Before the audit, conducting a readiness assessment can help identify any areas that need improvement, ensuring you’re fully prepared for the evaluation. Investing in a readiness assessment can save your organization in the long run as it will help prepare you for the audit, act as a dry run, and get you ready to earn an unqualified opinion on your SOC 2 report. Similar to doing a practice test before a final exam.
In the end, both SOC 2 Type 1 and Type 2 reports serve important purposes, depending on what you need to demonstrate to clients. Type 1 offers a quick attestation, while Type 2 demonstrates your security controls work effectively over time, giving you the compliance checklist needed to reassure stakeholders.
In short, SOC 2 compliance is more than a certification—it’s a commitment to ongoing data security that builds trust and opens up new business opportunities.
What are the Key Components of a SOC 2 Type 2 Report?
In this section, we’ll lay out the key components of a SOC 2 Type 2 audit report, breaking down how each part plays a crucial role in ensuring effective security controls. These components are essential for demonstrating the suitability of the controls in place to protect sensitive data, providing a clear framework for businesses, user entities, and third-party auditors like CPA firms. Let’s take a closer look:
1. Description of the System
This section overviews the company’s system, including the software, infrastructure, and people involved. It explains how the organization operates, what data it manages, and how it provides software as a service. This sets the context for understanding the scope of the audit and the systems evaluated.
2. Trust Service Criteria
The Trust Service Criteria (TSC), or Trust Service Principles (TSP), focuses on essential areas like security, availability, confidentiality, and processing integrity. These criteria establish the standards by which an organization’s controls are evaluated, providing a framework to assess risk management processes that protect user data.
3. Management’s Assertion
This is where the organization formally asserts that it has implemented the necessary controls to meet the suitability requirements. This section is critical for user entities to understand how the company claims to protect their data and why the controls are appropriate.
4. Detailed Description of Controls
Here, the audit report outlines the specific security controls the company has implemented. These controls are essential for meeting risk management objectives and protecting customer data. Templates for internal policies, access control procedures, and other key practices may also be included to provide context on how these controls are structured.
5. Tests of Controls and Results
This section dives into the CPA firm’s evaluation of the controls. The auditors test these controls’ effectiveness over time and report the findings. This is one of the most important sections as it shows whether the controls were designed well and functioned effectively in practice.
6. Other Information Provided by the Service Organization
The company may include additional details, such as updates or relevant operational changes during the audit period. This section can offer further insight into the organization’s ongoing commitment to cybersecurity and how it adapts to new risks.
7. Inherent Limitations
Every system has limitations, and this part of the audit acknowledges those. It points out areas where, despite the controls, certain risks may still exist due to the natural limitations of technology or human error.
By understanding these components, businesses and user entities can make informed decisions about working with a service provider, ensuring their risk management processes are robust and effective. SOC 2 Type 2 compliance isn’t just about having controls in place—it’s about ensuring those controls work over time, giving companies and their clients confidence in the strength of their security posture.
How Much Does a SOC 2 Type 2 Audit Cost?
The pricing for a SOC 2 Type 2 audit can vary depending on several factors. Key contributors to the audit cost include the scope and complexity of your systems, the number of Trust Service Criteria being evaluated, and whether your organization undergoes a readiness assessment to identify gaps before the audit.
Fees also depend on your chosen CPA firm, as rates vary by experience and service level. Additionally, using compliance automation tools for ongoing monitoring can add some upfront costs, but they can streamline the process and enhance efficiency in the long term.
Cost is not the only factor to consider when choosing a SOC 2 auditor. Larger CPA firms can bring a wide array of experience and many resources. Smaller firms may have industry-specific experience at a more reasonable cost. Some specialized firms focus primarily on audits, like SOC 2, which provides greater efficiency in the process. Choosing the right SOC 2 auditor will depend on your organization’s specific situation. Still, it is important to remember the most important factor is to engage a reputable auditor that your clients and stakeholders will trust.
Understanding these factors will help you plan better for SOC 2 compliance while managing your budget effectively.
Maximizing your SOC 2 Type 2 Compliance
Achieving and maintaining SOC 2 Type 2 compliance can be complex and resource-intensive, but the right technology can simplify it. This is where AuditBoard’s CrossComply comes in. With its robust information security management system and compliance management solution, CrossComply streamlines the compliance process by automating monitoring, tracking, and reporting on key controls.By leveraging the power of compliance automation, you can reduce manual effort, enhance accuracy, and ensure your systems stay audit-ready year-round. To learn more about how CrossComply can help you ease the challenges of SOC 2 compliance, check out AuditBoard’s CrossComply for a comprehensive solution to your compliance needs.
John Duffield is a Manager of Product Solutions at AuditBoard. In his role, he meets with prospective customers to understand their processes and identifies how AuditBoard can help support their risk functions and solve for current state challenges. Prior to AuditBoard, he was a risk advisory consultant at Ernst & Young where he focused on third party risk and assurance.